In an opinion authored by chief justice roberts, the court held that tax credits are available to individuals in states that utilize a federallyfacilitated exchange. Burwell, the latest supreme court challenge to the affordable care act, could create. The plaintiffs in king appealed the decision to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. The supreme court opined in a 63 decision that the irc section 36b premium assistance tax credit is available both in marketplaces established by the state and by the federal government. That is, unfortunately, the best thing about the majority opinion, which labors mightily to. Instead of challenging obamacares constitutionality, or. Supreme court upholds obamacare subsidies in king v. This spring, the affordable care act will make its third trip to the supreme court. Respondent sylvia mathews burwell, secretary of health and human services, et al. Weve simplified king v burwell, the obamacare subsidy lawsuit. We explain the supreme court case, its history, ideology, and outcome in simple terms. Burwell were four residents of virginia who did not want to purchase health insurance.
We estimate that a victory for the plaintiff would increase the number of uninsured by 8. Weve been waiting for years now, but the supreme court is finally poised to issue an opinion in king v. Sylvia matthews burwell, in her official capacity as u. Burwell audio transcription for oral argument march 04, 2015 in king v. Burwell, secretary of health and human services, et al. The court held that congress did not delegate the authority to determine whether the tax credits are available through both statecreated and federally created exchanges to the internal revenue service, but the language of the statute clearly indicates that congress intended the tax credits to be available. The petitioners challenged the legality of premium and costsharing subsidies for low and.
Burwell, a challenge to the laws system of federal subsidies. Today, the supreme court issued its opinion in the king v. But legal doctrines developed to protect the states against. Burwell, the chief justice hands the obama administration a victory and justice scalia two losses. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. The supreme court will hear arguments on wednesday in king v.
This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the united states reports. Burwell, four virginia residents are a challenging an irs obamacare rule. Indeed, the legal principle here is one of basic statutory construction i. Burwell is a major victory for individuals seeking affordable health care coverage. Yes, its important because it impacts millions of people and billions of dollars, but its unparalleled. Dissenting opinion scalia petitioner david king, et al. Burwell is a case argued before the supreme court on march 4, 2015 that questions whether the patient protection and affordable care act aca permits the federal government to provide financial assistance in the form of premium tax credits to individuals through the federally established health. I have relocated the news mediablogsopinion section from a reference guide to the halbig cases to this post.
Supreme court upholds obamacare subsidies in siding with the administration in king v. Burwell, a lawsuit that contests the financial help available to some enrollees on the federal insurance exchanges in 34 states. Read the best quotes from roberts and scalia in the king v. The practical effect of the supreme courts 63 ruling in king v. The decision was 63, with chief justice john roberts delivering the courts majority opinion. Total effectuated enrollment and financial assistance by state s t a t e t o t a l e n r o llm e n t f e d e r a l e x c h a n g e t o t a l 7,314,952.
Burwell, the latest highstakes litigation over the future of the affordable care act. Burwell means that the court, for the second time in three years, will be deciding an issue that will have a major impact on the obama administration. Roberts and justice anthony kennedy joined the courts liberals. If in addition to a decision for the plaintiff in king v.
According to roberts, because the phrase an exchange established by the state is ambiguous as it relates to tax credits, the court. The courts decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise. The aca will, however, continue to be an issue in the runup to the 2016 elections. The plaintiff argues that the law prohibits the federal government from providing premium tax credits and costsharing reductions to residents of states that did not establish their health. Burwell case, a challenge to the affordable care act that could drastically alter the course of the obama administrations landmark law. And it is especially unlikely that congress would have dele gated this decision to the irs, which has no expertise in crafting health insurance. The length of this section made that original post a beast to download. Readers are requested to notify the reporter of decisions, supreme court of the united states, washington, d. Supporters of the affordable care act react with cheers as the opinion for health care is reported outside of the supreme court in. Burwell, announced monday, is the latest evidence of its slide toward paralysis. Burwell and the triumph of selective contextualism 39 the aca differed from the house bill in at least one significant respect. Burwell, a case about the affordable care acts tax subsidies, in early march. Affirmed, 63, in an opinion by chief justice roberts on june 25, 2015. Supreme court on june 25, 2015, held 63 that consumers who purchase health insurance on an exchange marketplace run by the federal government under the patient protection and affordable care.
Right now, the health insurance plans of millions of americans hang in the balance as the supreme court considers king v. Its all about states rightsbut the plaintiffs would rather you didnt know that. Burwell opinion notes, studies predicted that premiums, both inside and outside of. Burwell is important not because of the legal principles behind it, but more because it was a win for supporters of the aca. Justice scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which justices. Implications for public health policy and practice. Supreme court ruled on june 25, 2015 in the king v. The court of appeals for the fourth circuit affirmed. King v burwell was a lawsuit heard by the supreme court in 2015.
Burwell, the justices deal a blow to opponents of the affordable care act. Defenders of the federal governments position in king v. Audio transcription for opinion announcement june 25, 2015 part 2 in king v. On writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit brief of consumers research as amicus curiae in support of. They would be exempt from obamacares coverage requirement if the price of buying health insurance cost more than 8 percent of their individual incomes. Burwell and congressional standing to sue congressional research service summary on november 21, 2014, the house of representatives filed a lawsuit against the departments of health and human services and the treasury, pursuant to h. Millions of consumers across 34 states who rely on the subsidies to afford their health care insurance coverage will keep. In the plaintiffs opinion, the irs violated the plain language of the law enacted by congress, which gave. Remanding the case allows the lower courts to consider whether the existing or modified regulations may properly balance the interests at issue. Supreme court of the united states david king, et al. In summary, it is business as usual for the affordable care act. The fourth circuit viewed the act as ambiguous and subject. The supreme court is expected to issue a decision in king v. Judge gregory wrote the opinion, in which judge thackerand senior judge davis joined.
Location united states district court for the eastern district of virginia, richmond division. In her concurring opinion, justice sonia sotomayor wrote that nothing in the majority opinion should be construed as signaling to lower courts where the supreme court stands on the merits of the case. Later this month, the high court will issue a decision in king v. Justice ginsburgs opinion for the court, which was unanimous on all but one point about citing legislative history to show the statutes purpose, not only didnt follow king v. On march 4, 2015, the supreme court heard arguments in the king v. Burwell case, in which the plaintiff argues that the aca prohibits payment of premium tax credits and costsharing reductions to people in states without statemanaged marketplaces. So opined six justices of the supreme court, including its most liberal members, in king v. Sebelius challenged an irs regulation imposed under the affordable care act, better known as obamacare, that allows subsidies on both state and federallyestablished health insurance exchanges. Burwell argue that they should prevail based on federalism considerations.
103 654 1521 1484 653 1166 408 432 553 339 38 351 55 865 217 98 1166 237 918 1192 1252 773 662 325 1025 167 374 440 1423 1437 101 481 381 1513 1300 1391 397 957 554 1016 924 756 1486 1276 160 353 53